What is Viral Marketing?
A while back I mentioned that I was beginning work on an article about viral marketing. Well, as that article moves closer and closer to being finished I find myself faced with the need to add a concluding paragraph. Of course, this is problematic because one of my conclusions is that it is impossible to know if you’ve created something viral. In fact, much of the article focuses on understanding the real goal of this kind of marketing, which is contagiousness. When you create a “viral” element, the goal is to create something that people will be impelled to pass around.
In response to this Mobile Technology Weblog post about viral marketing, I commented:
I think the issue here may be a semantic one. The more I think about the term “viral” marketing, the more it bothers. After all, a virus is “an infective agent that typically consists of a nucleic acid molecule in a protein coat, is too small to be seen by light microscopy, and is able to multiply only within the living cells of a host.” Now, isn’t that the ultimate goal of all marketing? Isn’t the goal of any advertisement to infect a person and multiply inside them, thus connecting the individual and the brand? It seems to me that contagious marketing is a much better term for what this is. The goal of this kind of marketing is to create something that impels a person to spread it through online channels.
While I understand that when spread, this type of marketing follows a similar path to that of a virus, however, if you haven’t made some contagious, it can never hope to “go viral” (if that makes sense).
Anyway, after reading this very interesting 1997 article about how Hotmail used viral tactics to grow it’s user base (found via The Mobile Technology Weblog) I thought I might explore some of the ideas out loud here, in hope of getting to a conclusion for myself. What’s interesting about Hotmail’s growth is that rather than spending money on advertising to add users, they simply added a little message at the bottom of each email that made the recipient realize that the sender was using a new, free web-based email. Hotmail used it’s users’ email messages as an advertising platform, just as another company might use billboards or television commercials in the non-digital world. While it’s certainly a fairly intrusive way to get the word out, it’s undeniably contagious because everyone who sends an email has no choice but to extol the value of Hotmail. They have become carriers of Hotmail’s message.
What’s so interesting about this is that people might not necessarily think of it as “viral,” especially people in marketing. I expect that’s because we’ve slowly backed ourselves into a corner of just what a “viral” element is, which is why it seems so important to me to back up and concentrate on the contagiousness of the message. Essentially this kind of marketing looks to use ordinary people’s online connections as its advertising platform. Hotmail found a way to tap into that network without the express consent of the users, most advertisers, however, don’t have that option.
With that said, though, there’s no reason we should limit “viral” to videos or interactive games. As shown by Hotmail, something can go “viral” by utilizing the medium in new and exciting ways. In the case of Hotmail, there is little doubt that the medium is the message, with each email contained a snippet that introduced the reader to this new service that obviously works well enough that their friend has chosen to use it. Marketers need to expand their zone of comfort. Marketers need to forget what they’ve learned and open their minds to new things. To quote from Weiden + Kennedy’s five rules of creativity, “come in ignorant every day. The idea of retaining ignorance is sort of counterintuitive, but it subverts a lot of [problems] that come from absolute mastery. If you think you know the answer better than somebody else does, you become closed to being fresh.”
It’s for this reason we need to remember the purpose (contagiousness), the audience (most often those people who are bored at work) and the medium (the internet and, increasingly, mobile devices). If marketers insist on trying to create “viral” elements than it’s important to remember one simple thing: Start with what you know and work your way to an idea, not vice-versa.

Hi, I'm 
Hey Noah
Fundamentally I agree with what you say. But I think that given the choice I would describe contagion as having two essential elements.
One is that the product, or subject of contagion, meets and probably exceeds user expectations.
The other is that it makes the recipient / viewer / reader / user / browser becomes enthusiastic about it, enough to talk about it in whatever medium they use most.
If you have that, then you have the makings of viral marketing. If you can circumvent that somehow, ala Hotmail, then you’re already winning – just keep up the good service / product.
You make both of the above happen by doing two very different things.
1. You build / make / email / deliver something that is really, really good. People don’t jump into their social circles with a “virus”, spouting something that is average or ordinary. They talk about something new, that won’t make them look like an idiot to their peers.
2. You give it to them or present it to them in a way which makes them feel like they have to pass it on. This must be easy for them to do, it must be something that they know their social circle hasn’t seen before or will appreciate, and it must make them feel good about it. Making them laugh os probably good too – we’re gregarious creatures us huimans ;-)
Marketers too often put out stuff that is ordinary, badly produced, and run of the mill to the audience. Flash games don’t work unless they do something new and exciting and newsworthy. Mobile screensavers are commodoties now, and so are the ringtones unless they are truly unique (cue crazy frog). Services have to have that “wow” factor in order for them to get talked about. I have probably 4 or 5 web based email accounts, but I only talk about Gmail, ‘cos it’s superior by far.
I also think that when you start off trying to do something viral, as you say, you’re already on the wrong track. Start by doing something that is insanely great, that is the best that you can creatively come up with, and then make it easy to talk about before you send it out. If you’ve done that, then you’ve done all you can. What follows is your choice of target market, your maximal delivery medium and your timing.
Anyways – starting to ramble ;-) My 0.02 cents.
er… humans…
;-)
Thanks Gareth, that’s great. Will need some time to think about, but thanks so much for the response. Lots of good points in there, awesome.
Cool ;-)