No More Genres
After a totally insane weekend at Electric Picnic, I am back and ready to write again. I’ve got three entries in my head at the moment, so hopefully that means there will be a bit more real substance around here and a bit less randomness. Just so people can hold me to it, the entries are: “the death of the middle” (how the middle was never efficient, but it’s a worse time than ever to try and compete in that space), another entry I can’t remember at this very moment (damnit!) and “the blurriness of music today” (which is what you’re going to read now).
I first start thinking about the idea of no more musical genres as I was sitting at Live Earth at the Meadowlands. The lineup included Keith Urban, AFI, Akon, Fallout Boy, John Mayer, Alicia Keys, Melissa Ethridge, Dave Matthews, Kanye West, Smashing Pumpkins, Bon Jovi, Roger Waters and the Police. There is very little all those bands have in common except for the fact they all sell a lot of records and they all played in New Jersey that day. I don’t know that this is necessarily a new idea, but it really struck me that musical genres really seem to be disintegrating before our very eyes. We all know hip-hop is mainstream, but how about Kanye West sampling French electronic band Daft Punk in his newest single?
This weekend the same thing struck me. The mix of music at Electric Picnic was eclectic to say the least as bands like Iggy Pop, Bjork, Primal Scream, Polyphonic Spree, LCD Soundsystem and Chemical Brothers shared billing on the main stage and Beastie Boys, !!!, Nouvelle Vague and The Go! Team pulled huge crowds at side stages. Once again, these bands have incredibly little in common other than the fact they showed up on the program together, yet everyone seemed to enjoy every one. Sure there were enough people at both Live Earth and Electric Picnic to support different groups seeing different genres, however, I don’t suspect that’s actually what happened. Rather, people’s musical tastes and music in general seems to be blurring to a point that finding the lines between genres is nearly impossible. It seems that everything is just “pop”.
So how did we get here? Well, as I’m sure you expect me to say, I believe it has much to do with digital access to music. People are listening to more music than ever before (as the never-ending sea of white headphones attests to) and I expect this includes artists as well. In addition, the speed at which a band can reach popularity at this point is astounding. One review on Pitchfork for Clap Your Hands and Say Yeah! turned them into indie darlings overnight. Then, thanks to access to their music on MP3 blogs and the like, the buzz built to a level that eventually led to a mention in Rolling Stone as a hot new band for 2005 (an amazing feat if you consider that Clap Your Hands and Say Yeah! is one of the oddest bands on the planet and fronted by a lead singer who puts the “ine” in “whine”).
Anyway, the point of all this is to say that the world is blurring and music is probably a great case study in how and why.
Update (9/5/07): Just remembered another entry I’ve been meaning to write: “What Google Gears is all about” (another “it’s only a matter of time before Google takes over the universe” post)
Update (9/5/07): In going through my feeds I ran across this entry from Rob Walker comparing Kanye/Justin to Prince/Michael (or disputing that comparison, rather). Two sentences that relate to this entry: “I don’t know whether it’s a permanent change or just a slump, but pop music is just not the center of pop culture to the degree it was in the Prince/Jackson era, and surely West must be aware of this.” and “Meanwhile, who is really the new Michael Jackson? The iPhone of course.” My first reaction to the first quote was to say that pop music is still at the center, it’s just that the definition has become much blurrier. However, while I do think pop’s definition has changed, Walker has a point about the iPhone. I’d even take it further to say that nothing competes with Michael/Prince in their heyday because there’s just more of everything competing for attention. Therefore, even the most popular things get a smaller percentage. (I know that’s not incredibly insightful, but hey.)

Hi, I'm 
I’d have to agree, particularly on the tech tip. A broadband connection changes everything. Add to that the fact that digitalism–not the band, but our current state of being (digitality?)–makes so much information and entertainment readily available. Consider how landing on any of almost 200 million MySpace pages exposes you to new music, and you can see you another cause for the seemingly quick erosion of genre lines.
I think this has been true for some time. It’s why http://www.musicovery.com is such an appealing idea -mood being an eternally universal differentiator. Shame they haven’t moved such a smart idea on in the last couple of years.
And of course, genres immediately become nostalgic commodities to slap onto T-shirts. because we all need more T-shirts.
one of the real reasons we’ve stopped categorizing music is because the people who used to be responsible for it are no longer in business: sam goody and such. they used to determine was “classic rock” was or the difference between “pop” and “rock.” but the same thing is happening in other popular art mediums. the line between comedy and drama on television barely exists anymore. but this is something that started happening in music more than a decade ago.
Don’t forget that it’s not just about music distribution — it also has to do with changes in how music is created. Musicians in every genre have access to basically the same tool kit, in the sense that software like Pro Tools seems to be pretty standard across the industry.
But really, since legitimate distinctions like distance are starting to become less relevant — the empirical lives of three people in, say, New York City, Omaha, and London, are still somewhat different, but much more similar than they’ve ever been before — should it come as any surprise that more arbitrary classifications are being recognized as such and accorded less importance? I mean, I’m more excited about the new Rilo Kiley album than I’ve been about an album in years, but is it rock or pop or country or alt country rock pop or what? Who cares? Call it nothing at all, and the songs are no less great.
Consider the Prince/MJ era: an AVID music fan had no more than 100 – 150 pieces of vinyl back then. Using the formula of 10 songs per album you’re looking at no more than 1500 songs. MTV played music videos. Concerts were reasonably priced. Today, thanks to lower acquisition costs (read: FREE) and easier distribution methods, I don’t know anyone who would consider themselves to be “avidâ€? music fans that doesn’t have at least 10x that many songs. MTV does not play music videos and, of course, concerts are outrageously priced. In my mind, this equation has absolutely shifted music from being the center of pop culture to background noise. It’s now there to merely accompany a film, a subway ride or an IM conversation whereas back in the day putting on music and LISTENING was the entirety of the experience…
As a whole, I think the blurring of genres is great for music and has actually created some amazing pieces of art that will stand the test of time including “Crazy� by Gnarls Barkley or the audiovisual brilliance of “D.A.N.C.E.� by Justice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo_QVq2lGMs And yes, this is a shameless plug for Downtown Music :)
Great post.
JK
I really lucky to find this web site on bing, just what I was searching for : D besides bookmarked .