LATEST ENTRY

RANDOM | Noah Brier

Randomocity

Just a bunch of links and assorted thoughts.

August 1, 2008 | RSS | EMAIL | PRINT | 6 COMMENTS

Nothing substantial to write, but here's a bit of linkage that didn't make it into the sidenotes for your enjoyment.

  • One of the things that drove me crazy in high school and college was the when teachers/professors put a value on printed content over web content, as if being bound and sitting on a library shelf makes something more meaningful or true than something published online ... Anyway, I think that's only moderately related to this letter from a librarian to a patron who was complaining about a children's book that includes gay marriage. Ultimately, the librarian rightly refuses to remove the book from the children's section, arguing that it is in fact a children's book. However, it was his explanation of the role of libraries that I found especially fascinating: "But if the library is doing its job, there are lots of books in our collection that people won't agree with; there are certainly many that I object to. Library collections don't imply endorsement; they imply access to the many different ideas of our culture, which is precisely our purpose in public life." (via kottke.org)
  • Other than making it look prettier and getting rid of the dots, what's new about delicious? I was expecting some awesome recommendations or something (which they had for a short time a few years ago but got rid of because of the resources it hogged. As as side note, I just read this really interesting and approachable paper on TiVo's collaborative filtering approaches. It's a great primer for how all that stuff works and why gives some insight into why it hogs resources in the way it does.
  • This Times story on the testing of female Olympic athletes to ensure their femaleness was fascinating. Turns out it's been happening since the 1960s and "At first, women were asked to parade nude before a panel of doctors to verify their sex. At the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City, officials switched to a chromosomal test." What's crazy about the new test is that a few times it has turned out chromosomal defects like woman (or people who had spent their lives believing they were women) finding out they were born with a Y chromosome. If you're interested, I found this detailed account of how this works (a woman with an X and a Y) that's specifically about an olympic athlete, Maria Patino, who failed this test in the 80s.
  • I just found out about TripIt from Rick which led me to two important questions: A) Why didn't I know about this service? (You forward your airline confirmation emails and it keeps all your flights and confirmation numbers in one easy to access place) and B) Why doesn't Dopplr do this yet? (That was actually Rick's question ... but I'm stealing it.)
  • How about a 42kb zip file that when fully unpacked contains 4.5 petabytes of data? ("The file contains 16 zipped files, which again contains 16 zipped files, which again contains 16 zipped files, which again contains 16 zipped, which again contains 16 zipped files, which contain 1 file, with the size of 4.3GB.") If anyone has a spare 4.5 petabytes and tries this out, let me know how it goes.
  • I like Andy's idea for the "worst iPhone app ever: "It’d be dead simple to build, and I’d call it “iPhone Discus”. Basically it would use the phone’s built in GPS to see how far you could throw your iPhone. Enter a location, throw, record location. That’s it."
  • Since this is a post full of random stuff, it seems appropriate to link to someone else's post about the value of random posts in blogs: "Think of a blog as competing with both Google and Wikipedia, among other aggregators. If you knew you wanted to read about 'the minimum wage,' you could bypass Tyler and Alex and Google to the best entries (some of which might include us, of course). But with Google and Wikipedia you must choose the topic. A good blog writer can randomize the topic for you, much like a good DJ controls the sequence of the music." I really believe this is the secret to why editorial driven content will remain relevant in the long run (yes, that includes newspapers): The best stuff is always the stuff you weren't expecting to read. I think this is what makes the New Yorker so great, actually. I don't think there's ever been an article I've opened up and said, "I've got to read that." But then you get like 3000 words in and you say, "I'm so glad I started this thing." (Once again via Kottke)
  • This high school commencement speech from Patton Oswalt includes one of the more insightful things I've read recently. He quotes Bob Hope as saying, "When I was twenty, I worried what everything thought of me. When I turned forty, I didn’t care what anyone thought of me. And then I made it to sixty, and I realized no one was ever thinking of me."
  • When Super Mario Bros characters fight back. (via the excellent new Team Tiger Awesome Variant Tumblr Edition)

That's it for now I think. I'm exhausted and head back to New York tomorrow (am in San Diego at the moment). Good night.

Oh, actually, one more thing. Am on a little video podcast kick (enjoying them as a way to kill time at the gym). Anyone have any recommendations?

PREVIOUS ENTRY | NEXT ENTRY

LEAVE A COMMENT

First name, first and last, whatever you feel like.

Required, but not displayed (so don't worry about spam).

If you've got one, flaunt it.

You can use some HTML (a's, br's, p's, oh my!) if you'd like, if you don't know what that means, don't worry about it.

REMEMBER ME?

COMMENTS

1jeff

Ten thoughts on the state of current cinema (at 3:40 in the morning:
1. I'm sick and tired of hearing people tell me that it's great art when a man in a rubber suit fights a guy wearing make-up. Is that what we've become?

2. If Heath Ledger really went crazy because the role of the Joker plagued him, then Heath Ledger was a moron. You know who lived a long time? Cesar Romero, Frank Gorshin, Jack Nicholson...etc. Or did Heath really get it?

3. If LITTLE CHILDREN were made in French, it would have been hailed as one of the greatest films about adultery ever made.

4. I like it when Hollywood buys into fads. The poker movies were as boring as poker (I saw LUCKY YOU), the street dancing movies were uber-gay and now they're making MMA movies. Hollywood used to set the cultural trends. Now it reads US WEEKLY.

5. Enough with these Seth Rogen pictures, please. If I want to watch a bunch of guys sit around and talk about popular culture, I'll hang out with a bunch of guys and talk about pop culture. (Side note: weed hasn't been funny since Cheech left Chong.)

6. By the way, Robert Duvall is in LUCKY YOU. Where do you think he ranks that in his career? Somewhere between Godfather I and...Godfather II?

7. Go see DOUBT when it comes out in December. If Shanley's made a movie half as good as his brilliant play, you're in for a wonderful experience. The guy's last directorial effort was JOE VERSUS THE VOLCANO, my favorite film of all-time.

8. Steven Spielberg, Harrison Ford and anyone that was on set at any time during that so-called Indiana Jones picture should be ashamed of themselves.

9. When I said I saw LUCKY YOU, I meant LUCKY YOU is on right now. And I can't vouch for this, but I think it's on its fourth hour. ("You got it backwards kid. You play cards the way you should lead your life. And you lead your life the way you should play cards." -I'm dead serious. Duvall just said that.)

10. Next time you're in a bar and you meet someone who says they love movies, ask them what they think of BRIEF ENCOUNTER. If they haven't seen it (and you want to sleep with them) make that your first date. (1) It's a beautiful movie. (2) It's classy. (3) It beats Drew Barrymore telling Eric Bana she doesn't want to see him anymore while they're riding in a golf cart.

August 1, 2008

2ryan Fitzgerald

video podcast:

Harvard business video ideacast
can be boring sometimes but the info is stellar...

August 1, 2008

3Aimee

"So sex is much more a matter of hormones than of chromosomes. [...] In practical terms, this arrangement means that it is the hormone environment of the womb, not the chromosomes, that directly determines the sex of the fetus."

In an abnormal psych class I took a few years ago, the professor presented some studies that looked at the impact of 'the hormonal environment of the womb' on sexual orientation. Seems that pre-natal stress (though this is still hotly debated) can result in homosexuality. (article on Google Scholar)

August 2, 2008

4james gross

MAKE: Weekend Projects with Kipkay is always fun.

August 3, 2008

5Noah Brier

@Jeff: Uh, thanks.

@Ryan: Thanks, will give it a shot.

@Aimee: Thanks, will check it out.

@James: Yeah, i tried that one ... found it a bit boring actually ...

August 3, 2008

6Alan Wolk

1.) That librarian's brilliant- who'd have thunk there'd be a popular librarian blog. (Though it does seem obvious once you consider it.)

2) re: Olympics- not sure if you saw this today: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/opinion/03boylan.html
It's the story of how a well-known female athlete from the 1936 Olympics was revealed to be an (anatomical) male during her autopsy 50 years later.

3) The serendipity of finding articles you weren't expecting is one of the things I worry we lose as people abandon newspapers and magazines. Reading the New Yorker online, I'm far less likely to begin reading an article I didn't think I'd like. Ditto the New York Times, where I often stumble on things as I turn the pages. The whole idea of "personalized news" has always been repellent to me because so many of my favorite articles have been things I've stumbled upon randomly. And while random Google hits is an interesting idea, I suspect most people will progress right to Wikipedia, etc., since content on the web, especially blogs is still too much of an unknown- with the New Yorker or the Times, I have a very good chance of that random article being well-written and engaging, e.g. worth the time and effort to even check it out.

4) If you're able to watch video podcasts at the gym, you're probably not working out as hard as you should be. Unless they're the kind of podcasts you don't really need to watch as much as listen to (sort of like the Today Show, where I don't really need to see Condi Rice or Matt Lauer to digest what they're saying.)

August 4, 2008